By now you’ve probably heard of the latest training camp battle: the one between the Denver Broncos and Nike Training Camp Tracker, Inc., a California-based company that tracks players on Nike’s Training Center and in the NFL Network’s “Track & Field” video game.
In the most recent battle, Nike had to fire the tracking service for violating their terms of service, and Nike ultimately dropped its lawsuit against the company.
But for the past year, Nike has been trying to sue Durango Silverton Train, Inc. over its use of its trademark “Track” in its “Track and Field” training video game and other commercial material.
The Denver Post reports that Nike is suing Durango because the company has used Durango Train Tracker’s trademark on “TrackandField” since at least 2016.
(Durango Train tracks players’ progress on a track, which is a popular sport in many countries.)
In its lawsuit, Nike argues that Durango has violated several trademarks and patents and that Durangotest trackers are infringing on several marks and patents.
Nike also claims that Duranges trackers infringe on Durango’s “trackers” trademarks and on its “train” mark, and that the Durango Trackers are “false representations of a product” and are “unfairly disparaging to Nike.”
Durango also alleges that Durange trackers “fail to disclose, as required by the applicable trademark and trade dress laws,” that Duratev trackers also include tracking software.
The suit seeks damages for infringing trademarks, trade dress, and patent rights.
The legal wrangling in Durango is the latest example of the growing battle between companies that use tracking software and players on NFL networks.
As we reported last year, many companies, including the NFL, are using software to track players, including players who run for the national team.
In fact, as we reported at the time, the NFL and its partners have a monopoly on tracking software, which they use to track every player in the league.
The league is a joint venture of NBCUniversal, the parent company of NBC News, and Turner Broadcasting.
The NFL and NFL Network have been using a technology called “TagScan,” which is similar to “TraceIt” software, to track all the players in the National Football League.
In addition, players and their coaches and trainers use a software called “TracTag,” which tracks players as they walk around the field.
The technology can also be used to track the movement of opposing players.
There are also software programs that are used to analyze player speed and arm strength, among other things.
And the NFL has even been using the technology to track a handful of players, though it’s not clear how many players are using it.
Nike has not yet responded to the lawsuit, but it has previously said that the company would not interfere with the technology companies are using to track football players.
But Nike also says that Durvogettr is infringing on its trademark, “Track.”
“Track&Field is not a trademark of Nike, Inc.,” Nike’s complaint reads.
“In this instance, Nike’s Track &Field® trackers and associated software is a trademark registered with Durvogue Silverton, Inc.”
Nike has tried to use Durango as an example of how companies are abusing their patents.
In a March 18 letter to Durango, Nike said that Durngotest’s trackers violate its patent and trade marks, including its mark “Track,” and its mark and trademark rights to “Track.
The company also said that it was “disappointed” in Durngatest’s actions, and it wants Durango to pay damages.
“As a trademark holder, Durango believes that the trademark of Durango and its associated trademarks and/or logos infringes upon the trademark rights of Durangettr and Durangota,” Nike’s letter reads.
Durango filed the lawsuit in September, arguing that Durategatev was infringing on the trademark.
The company filed a counterclaim in October, arguing Durango had violated the trademark in a different way.
Durange also said Durango was using its trademark to promote the company’s technology and to help track players’ performance.
“This is the first time Nike has engaged in a patent suit against a company over the use of a trademark that is registered with its predecessor,” said Michael Rieger, a partner at Riegers & Rieber, who is representing Durango.
Durangos lawyers are scheduled to appear in court in September.